Plus refers to: 1) personal characteristics associated with discrimination (e.g. age, disability) 2) features of relationships (e.g. smoking parents, excluded from school 3) time-dependent …

To address health equity in Cochrane Reviews, review authors may: consider health equity at the question formulation stage, possibly using a logic model; decide what methods will be used to …

Nov 1, 2023 · Conclusion Our synthesis demonstrated that researchers currently collect a limited range of equity-relevant data, but usefully provides a range of examples spanning …

Background: The Campbell and Cochrane Equity Methods Group has adopted the PROGRESS-Plus to identify dimensions across which health inequities may exist. Despite the demand for …

Our objectives were to identify what and how data relating to the social determinants of health are collected and reported in equity-relevant studies and map these data to the PROGRESS-Plus …

PUBLIC HEALTH Evidence for Equity seeks to highlight which interventions work and which don’t work (and may be harmful) and to provide this information to people making decisions about …

May 1, 2024 · Our aims were to, first, identify and summarize the use of methods, frameworks, and tools as a conceptual basis for investigating dimensions of equity impacts of public health …

We then screened the studies in the included systematic reviews for those that reported their outcomes by socioeconomic status or other PROGRESS-Plus (Cochrane Equity Methods …

Mar 18, 2021 · The PROGRESS acronym is designed to remind researchers to consider the factors which may affect health opportunities and outcomes.

The Migrant Health Subgroup works within the Equity Methods Group to advocate for systematic reviews that reflect the particular needs of international migrants, by facilitating clinically …

This complements a Cochrane review (Welch 2022) that surveyed the descriptive and analytic methods used to investigate health equity via PROGRESS-Plus. Methods: Umbrella review of …

Dec 5, 2024 · Furthermore, examination of the published trial reports revealed that many of the PROGRESS inequity factors had been collected at baseline, unlike most of the ‘PROGRESS …