Both Asana and Wrike have specific use cases that make each a good fit for a specific audience. Each is a strong project management tool that can be used to coordinate across teams to get work done at a very high level. Asana is best for coordinating complex projects across teams where tasks need to define as subtasks with different owners.

The main differences between Wrike and Asana are form and function. Asana comes with a much better design and offers smoother navigation. Both have solid free plans, but Asana’s is much more generous. Little separates the two price-wise, but Wrike is slightly cheaper and could be the better option on a tight budget.

Both Wrike and Asana have a forever free plan. After that, Asana has three paid plans, while Wrike has four. The biggest difference is that, while Asana costs a few more dollars per user, it offers unlimited resources as standard. Wrike’s base price is cheaper, but you’ll likely have to spend more to get to the same features as Asana.

Deciding on which is best between Wrike and Asana really comes down to the needs of your company or team, but Wrike has the edge on Asana if you need a project management tool for a large team or business. Asana is a better choice than Wrike for individuals and small teams.

Wrike is fully-fledged project management software that's ideal for teams who want their project to have a very strict organizational hierarchy. Asana has a more minimalistic and modern-looking interface that allows users to be up and running in very little time.