is citing wikipedia reliable - Search
About 137,000 results
Open links in new tab
    Kizdar net | Kizdar net | Кыздар Нет
  1. There is disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source, but most academics agree that you shouldn’t cite it in your writing, for two main reasons:

    • As an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a tertiary source, which means it doesn’t provide original insights or analysis. Usually, only primary and secondary sources are cited in academic writing.
    • Because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone and its articles are constantly updated, it’s possible for unreliable information to be added without you knowing. ...
    Learn more:

    There is disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source, but most academics agree that you shouldn’t cite it in your writing, for two main reasons:

    • As an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a tertiary source, which means it doesn’t provide original insights or analysis. Usually, only primary and secondary sources are cited in academic writing.
    • Because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone and its articles are constantly updated, it’s possible for unreliable information to be added without you knowing. ...
    www.scribbr.com/citing-sources/how-to-cite-wikipe…
    You should not cite Wikipedia as a source for your research. You should always validate anything you use for research in a reliable source.
    libguides.umgc.edu/c.php?g=709287&p=5410209
    One investigation by the Nature editorial team showed that, on average, articles on academic topics in Wikipedia only had one more error per entry than articles in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, which had three errors on average. A study from 2012 even found that Wikipedia was more reliable than the Encyclopaedia Britannica.
    lumivero.com/resources/blog/can-i-cite-wikipedia-i…
    By citing sources for Wikipedia content you enable users to verify that the cited information is supported by reliable sources – improving the credibility of Wikipedia while showing that the content is not original research.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources

    Conversely:

    • Don’t cite Wikipedia in an academic paper or presentation.
    • Don’t use Wikipedia as your only source.
    • Don’t blindly accept what Wikipedia articles tell you just because there is a source attached. Like any source, the source listed in Wikipedia might be bad or inappropriately used.
    opentext.ku.edu/becredible/chapter/wikipedia/
     
  2. People also ask
     
  3. How to Cite a Wikipedia Article | APA, MLA & Chicago - Scribbr

     
  4. What’s Wrong with Wikipedia? | Harvard Guide to Using Sources

  5. How to Cite Wikipedia in APA Format - Grammarly

  6. Help:Referencing for beginners - Wikipedia

  7. Is Wikipedia a good source? 2 college librarians …

    Mar 20, 2023 · The five pillars establish Wikipedia as a free online encyclopedia, with articles that are accurate and cite reliable sources, and editors – called Wikipedians – who avoid bias and treat one...

  8. Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia - Wikipedia

  9. Research Guides: Wikipedia: Editing and Use: Citing Wikipedia

  10. Is Wikipedia a reliable source for academic research? - Scribbr

  11. Citing Wikipedia - Resources for Using & Editing Wikipedia

  12. How to Cite Wikipedia in MLA Format - Grammarly

  13. How to cite a Wikipedia article - MyBib

  14. Wikipedia Entry References - APA Style

  15. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

  16. Students are told not to use Wikipedia for research. But it’s a ...

  17. Are there instances where citing Wikipedia is allowed?

  18. Can I cite Wikipedia in my paper? - Lumivero

  19. Wikipedia:Citing sources - Wikipedia

  20. What Are Credible Sources & How to Spot Them | Examples

  21. Is Wikipedia a good source? When to use the online …

  22. UMGC Library: Research Tutorial: What about Wikipedia?