About 137,000 results
Any time
Open links in new tab
-
Kizdar net |
Kizdar net |
Кыздар Нет
There is disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source, but most academics agree that you shouldn’t cite it in your writing, for two main reasons:
- As an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a tertiary source, which means it doesn’t provide original insights or analysis. Usually, only primary and secondary sources are cited in academic writing.
- Because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone and its articles are constantly updated, it’s possible for unreliable information to be added without you knowing. ...
Learn more:There is disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source, but most academics agree that you shouldn’t cite it in your writing, for two main reasons:
- As an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a tertiary source, which means it doesn’t provide original insights or analysis. Usually, only primary and secondary sources are cited in academic writing.
- Because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone and its articles are constantly updated, it’s possible for unreliable information to be added without you knowing. ...
www.scribbr.com/citing-sources/how-to-cite-wikipe…You should not cite Wikipedia as a source for your research. You should always validate anything you use for research in a reliable source.libguides.umgc.edu/c.php?g=709287&p=5410209One investigation by the Nature editorial team showed that, on average, articles on academic topics in Wikipedia only had one more error per entry than articles in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, which had three errors on average. A study from 2012 even found that Wikipedia was more reliable than the Encyclopaedia Britannica.lumivero.com/resources/blog/can-i-cite-wikipedia-i…By citing sources for Wikipedia content you enable users to verify that the cited information is supported by reliable sources – improving the credibility of Wikipedia while showing that the content is not original research.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sourcesConversely:
- Don’t cite Wikipedia in an academic paper or presentation.
- Don’t use Wikipedia as your only source.
- Don’t blindly accept what Wikipedia articles tell you just because there is a source attached. Like any source, the source listed in Wikipedia might be bad or inappropriately used.
opentext.ku.edu/becredible/chapter/wikipedia/- People also ask
What’s Wrong with Wikipedia? | Harvard Guide to Using Sources
How to Cite Wikipedia in APA Format - Grammarly
Help:Referencing for beginners - Wikipedia
Is Wikipedia a good source? 2 college librarians …
Mar 20, 2023 · The five pillars establish Wikipedia as a free online encyclopedia, with articles that are accurate and cite reliable sources, and editors – called Wikipedians – who avoid bias and treat one...
Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia - Wikipedia
Research Guides: Wikipedia: Editing and Use: Citing Wikipedia
Is Wikipedia a reliable source for academic research? - Scribbr
Citing Wikipedia - Resources for Using & Editing Wikipedia
How to Cite Wikipedia in MLA Format - Grammarly
How to cite a Wikipedia article - MyBib
Wikipedia Entry References - APA Style
Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia
Students are told not to use Wikipedia for research. But it’s a ...
Are there instances where citing Wikipedia is allowed?
Can I cite Wikipedia in my paper? - Lumivero
Wikipedia:Citing sources - Wikipedia
What Are Credible Sources & How to Spot Them | Examples
Is Wikipedia a good source? When to use the online …
UMGC Library: Research Tutorial: What about Wikipedia?