"Complementary" implies a stronger relationship between two things, whereas "supplementary" just means that one thing is additional or auxiliary to another. A complementary relationship is usually bidirectional and exclusive. Red and green are complementary colors of each other, and no other colors are the complements of either red or green.

May 23, 2024 · As the exchange between @Michael-Harvey and @FumbleFingers shows, even among native speakers there's not always a clear consensus. Spool vs reel can be used to distinguish what the tape is wound on, with "reel" referring to the part used in operation (in this case the spool and reel are the same physical thing) and "spool" meaning literally ...

Difference between ' and "Ask Question Asked 7 years, 10 months ago. Modified 5 years, 2 months ago. ...

Sep 15, 2020 · Now, the subtle difference between "on" and "about". They are practically identical, with only subtle differences in rare cases. While "on" will be always information directly "on" the subject - the direct data like name, own properties, things …

Sep 27, 2016 · is there any difference between "as early as "and "as beautiful as"? 1. that and where difference. 2.

Jun 7, 2021 · What is the spatial difference between in and on. 1. A comparison between "over" and "during" and ...

Apr 21, 2019 · As an example: In some cultures, people regard men as breadwinners. my textbook says: ''as breadwinners'' is the complement to ''regard'', but I think it is the attribute to ''men''.

The difference in meaning with respect to your example is that 'and' simply expresses that Lisa likes both, in general. The use of 'or' suggests exclusivity in some special circumstances. If I were to speculate, if offered a snack, Lisa might choose apples over bananas, she also might choose bananas over apples, i.e. the choice is exclusive ...

May 30, 2017 · I am confused now because I don't know what is the difference between in/to in the sentence like this one. For example : She has been to York. (And) She has been in York. She was in London (and) She was to London. What is the difference between them, do they have different meanings?

Jan 3, 2015 · SUPPLEMENTARY to TRomano's answer. We use could for general ability. But if you want to say somebody did something in a specific situation, use was/were able to, or managed to (not could). This does not accurately describe the use of these terms. Both CAN and BE able to may be used in either present or past tense to designate ‘general ability’: