It's also called an insufficient sample, a converse accident, a faulty generalization, a biased generalization, jumping to a conclusion, secundum quid, and a neglect of qualifications.

Hasty generalization fallacy is also called overgeneralization fallacy, faulty generalization, and argument from small numbers.

A Hasty Generalization fallacy, also called secundum quid Jumping to Conclusions or Anecdotal Evidense, is a logical error when you reach a conclusion not supported logically or by sufficient evidence.

A hasty generalization is one example of a logical fallacy, wherein someone reaches a conclusion that is not justified logically by objective or sufficient evidence. This is also known by several other names: insufficient sample faulty generalization biased generalization jumping to a conclusion converse accident neglect of qualifications